Status: Not Started
Priority: Critical
Last Updated: 2026-05-29
Contributors Welcome: Yes
Is the 7% volatility buffer rate sufficient to protect BCH sellers from price volatility during the covenant settlement window?
If the buffer is too small, sellers lose money when BCH price drops. If itโs too large, capital efficiency decreases and the system becomes less competitive.
7% buffer provides adequate protection for a 24-hour settlement window based on historical BCH volatility analysis.
Statistical analysis showing 7% buffer covers 95%+ of 24-hour price movements with acceptable capital efficiency tradeoff.
Track actual BCH price movements during trial covenants and measure buffer adequacy.
The buffer is intended to be dynamic โ sized from recent downward BCH price volatility, not a fixed 7% forever. The v2.6 covenant already supports this:
initialBchPriceInCents * minPricePercent at funding timeminPricePercent (e.g., derived from recent downward volatility) slots straight into the existing covenant without contract changesDesign intent (Suso, Aug 15): 7% is Phase 0โs fixed default. Dynamic sizing based on recent downward volatility is the target, and the covenant architecture accommodates it.
Note: A related but distinct idea (per-hour buffer pricing by sellers) is in variable-buffer-rate.
Skills needed: Data analysis, statistical modeling
Estimated effort: 4-6 hours
How to start: Pull BCH/USD historical data from major exchanges
| ๐ Home | โ Unknowns | ๐ Glossary |