Bull Pool Capital Sufficiency
Status: Not Started
Priority: Critical
Last Updated: 2026-06-18
Contributors Welcome: Yes
What We Don’t Know
Is €3,000 founder capital sufficient to bootstrap H€/HAu tokens for Phase 0?
Specifically:
- How many merchants can €3K support simultaneously?
- What’s the capital utilization rate (average lock vs total pool)?
- When will pool exhaust (forcing BCH fallback)?
- How much capital do we actually need before seeking external bulls?
Why It Matters
Capital determines system capacity.
If Pool Too Small (€3K Insufficient):
- Merchants try to mint H€ → “Pool exhausted” error
- User experience degrades (no stability available)
- Merchants quit (volatility exposure they didn’t want)
- System appears broken before it starts
If Pool Too Large (€3K Overkill):
- Capital sits idle (inefficient use of funds)
- Could bootstrap with less, deploy excess elsewhere
- Opportunity cost (could test with €1K, learn faster)
Sweet Spot:
- €3K supports X merchants comfortably
- Occasional pool exhaustion acceptable (teaches us limits)
- Proves mechanism before seeking more capital
Wrong estimate = Either wasted capital OR system can’t function.
Current Hypothesis
€3K is sufficient for Phase 0 if merchant velocity is high (weekly cash-out).
Reasoning from existing documentation:
“Scenario: 10 merchants, €100/month each, weekly VES conversion
Volume: €1000/month
Lock: €250 avg (weekly turnover)
Pool needed: €3000 supports 120 merchants at this velocity”
Assumptions baked in:
- High velocity: Merchants convert H€ → VES weekly (money tight)
- Small amounts: €100/month average per merchant
- Short contracts: 1 week (capital freed weekly)
- No hoarding: Merchants don’t accumulate long-term
Venezuelan intel supports this:
“If money is tight (and for most it is) they aren’t in a position to have savings. Initially they will dump it straight away.”
But what if assumptions are wrong?
Investigation Method
Step 1: Model Capital Utilization Scenarios
Scenario A: High Velocity (Best Case)
Merchants: 10
Monthly volume per merchant: €100
Cash-out frequency: Weekly
Contract period: 7 days
Average capital locked: €250 (25% utilization)
€3K pool supports: ~120 merchants
Scenario B: Medium Velocity (Realistic Case)
Merchants: 10
Monthly volume per merchant: €100
Cash-out frequency: Bi-weekly
Contract period: 7 days
Average capital locked: €500 (50% utilization)
€3K pool supports: ~60 merchants
Scenario C: Low Velocity (Worst Case)
Merchants: 10
Monthly volume per merchant: €100
Cash-out frequency: Monthly
Contract period: 7 days
Average capital locked: €1000 (100% utilization)
€3K pool supports: ~30 merchants
Deliverable: Table comparing pool capacity across velocity scenarios
Step 2: Analyze Sender Covenant Abort Demand
Additional H€ demand: When covenant aborts (BCH drops >7%), María gets H€.
Questions:
- How often does BCH drop >7% in short timeframes?
- What % of remittances would trigger abort?
- How much capital must reserve for abort scenarios?
Example:
If 5% of covenants abort per week
And average remittance is €100
And 100 total remittances/week
Abort demand: 5 × €100 = €500 H€ needed for aborts
Merchant demand: €1500 H€ for cash-outs
Total: €2000 pool utilization
Deliverable: Estimated pool allocation (merchant vs sender demand)
Step 3: Stress Test Capital Requirements
Black swan scenario: BCH crashes 20% overnight
All active covenants abort (>7% drop)
All merchants want to stabilize immediately
Simultaneous demand spike
How much capital needed to handle this?
Example:
10 active covenants × €100 = €1000 (sender aborts)
10 merchants × €200 avg holdings = €2000 (merchant stabilization)
Total spike: €3000
If pool = €3K: Barely handles crisis
If pool < €3K: System breaks at worst time
Deliverable: Stress test scenarios and pool resilience
Step 4: Benchmark Against Similar Projects
Research other BCH/crypto stability mechanisms:
- What capital did they bootstrap with?
- What was their user base at launch?
- How did they scale capital over time?
Examples to research:
- MUSD (before shutdown) - initial capital?
- StableHedge - pool size?
- Other AnyHedge implementations
Deliverable: Comparative analysis of bootstrap capital
Step 5: Survey Potential Phase 0 Participants
Ask Spanish sender groups:
- How many remittances per month?
- Average amount per remittance?
- Would you use H€ if covenant aborts?
Ask Venezuelan merchants:
- How much BCH would you accumulate monthly?
- Would you stabilize as H€, HAu, or keep BCH?
- How fast would you convert H€ to VES?
Deliverable: Demand estimates from actual users
Success Criterion
This unknown is answered when:
- ✅ We have modeled:
- Capital utilization across velocity scenarios
- Merchant vs sender demand split
- Stress test requirements
- Comparable projects’ bootstrap capital
- ✅ We can estimate:
- “€3K supports X merchants with Y% confidence”
- “Pool will exhaust when Z condition occurs”
- “We need €N for comfortable Phase 0”
- ✅ We make go/no-go decision:
- If €3K sufficient: Proceed with founder capital
- If €3K insufficient: Either reduce scope OR seek additional capital before launch
- If close: Launch with €3K + monitor + add capital when needed
Answered = “€3K supports [specific capacity], here’s the math, here’s the risk, here’s the plan.”
Contributor Guidance
Skills needed:
- Financial modeling (capital utilization, velocity)
- Data analysis (BCH volatility, abort frequency)
- Research (comparable projects, market sizing)
- Statistics (stress testing, scenario analysis)
Estimated effort: 4-6 hours
How to start:
- Get BCH/EUR price data (last 12 months)
- Calculate: How often does BCH drop >7% in 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days?
- Model capital lock = (monthly volume) × (holding period in days) / 30
- Create spreadsheet with scenarios (vary velocity, contract period, # merchants)
- Document findings in GitHub issue or email rufitnes@proton.me
Quick contribution: Even partial modeling helps! If you can only estimate one scenario, that’s valuable data.
Current Data Points
From existing documentation:
- Founder capital available: €3K
- Expected merchant volume: €100/month average
- Venezuelan merchant velocity: “dump it straight away” (high)
- VES inflation: ~5%/week (creates urgency to convert)
- Contract period (proposed): 1 week
- Phase 0 merchant target: ~10 merchants
Open questions:
- What % of merchants choose H€ vs HAu vs BCH?
- How much variance in merchant volume (€50-€500 range)?
- Do merchants accumulate over time or maintain steady state?
- What % of senders opt into H€ when covenant aborts?
Design trade-off note:
- Asgaya uses simple 1:1 pool (merchant shorts, pool longs)
- Alternative: StableHedge’s 50/50 split + 2x leverage = 2x more capital efficient (RS069)
- Trade-off: We chose simplicity over capital efficiency (easier to understand, fewer failure modes)
- Impact: €3K supports fewer merchants than leveraged model, but easier to implement/audit
Navigation