asgayapedia

Cross-Border Living

Scenario: People earning income in one currency, living/spending in another country

Examples:


The Problem

Common pattern across demographics:

Traditional friction:

Cost impact: €100-200/month in fees and spreads on typical spending


Asgaya Solution

Flow:

  1. Person receives income in home currency (pension/salary in EUR)
  2. Needs to pay local merchant (Thailand, Mexico, Morrocco, etc.)
  3. Opens Asgaya when making payment
  4. Pays BCH seller via home payment method (SEPA, Bizum, etc.)
  5. Local merchant receives BCH payment
  6. Done - home currency → local merchant, no conversion

Key benefit: Keep income in home currency, spend directly at local merchants via Asgaya


Why This Works

For sender:

For merchant:

For BCH seller:


Target Demographics

1. Retirees

Profile:

Geographic hotspots:

Typical income: €800-1,500/month pension


2. Digital Nomads / Remote Workers

Profile:

Geographic hotspots:


3. Seasonal Workers

Profile:

Pattern: Same Asgaya flow works in both locations - merchant network is global


Economic Impact

Traditional monthly costs (€1,200 spending):

- Wire transfer fees: €30
- Exchange rate spread: €20-30
- ATM withdrawals (4x): €20
Total monthly cost: €70-80 (5-7% of spending)
Annual cost: €840-960

Asgaya monthly costs (€1,200 spending):

- Seller fee (BCH purchase): 0.5% (€6)
Total monthly cost: €6
Annual cost: €72

Note: Merchant receives and keeps BCH (no cash-out fee). If merchant converts BCH to local currency later, they pay their own spread - not passed to customer.

Annual savings: €770-890 per year


Use Case Expansion

Same pattern applies to:

The pattern: Income in currency A, spending in country B, Asgaya bridges without conversion


Required Infrastructure

Merchant density: High enough for daily needs (groceries, restaurants, utilities)

Key merchant types:

Payment mechanism: Most cross-border living payments are direct BCH transfers (not covenants) since buyer and merchant are in same location or have recurring relationship. Covenants are for geographic/time separation (remittances), not local commerce.

BCH liquidity: Home currency → BCH sellers with competitive rates


Status

Phase 1+ - After remittance infrastructure proven

Why remittances bootstrap this: Merchant network built for remittances (family sending money to Thailand) automatically serves people living in Thailand. Same infrastructure, simpler flow (direct BCH payment instead of covenant in many cases).


Related: Tourist Payments, Informal Economy Access, Customer Journey